Skip to content

menu

Perkins Coie LLP logo
HomeServicesAbout UsContact
RSS Twitter Facebook LinkedIn youtube
Search
Close
HomeServicesAbout Us
Subscribe

Derivatives & Repo Report

A Buy-Side Guide to Regulatory and Transactional Issues Related To Derivatives and Repurchase Agreements

Mutual Fund Corner: SEC Enforcement Order Focuses on Custody of Cash Collateral on Swaps (And Absence of Tri-Party Control Agreement)

By Andrew P. Cross on February 12, 2015
Posted in Mutual Funds and Investment Advisers

The SEC recently brought an enforcement action against a mutual fund’s investment adviser for a violation of Section 17 of the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the “1940 Act”).  The enforcement order was notable, in that it involved cash collateral posted on total return and portfolio return swaps (“Swaps”).  Here is an overview of the enforcement order: 

  • To carry out the fund’s investment strategies, the investment adviser traded equities and derivatives including the Swaps;
  • Section 17 of the 1940 Act requires all mutual funds to comply with strict custody requirements.  Section 17(f)(5) of the 1940 Act generally provides that if a mutual fund maintians its securities and similar investments in the custody of a qualified bank (the “Fund Custodian”), the cash proceeds from the sale of such securities and similar investments and other cash assets of the fund must also be kept in the custody of the Fund Custodian;
  • According to the order, the investment adviser caused the fund to post contractually required cash collateral relating to the Swaps directly with the broker-dealer counterparties, instead of keeping the cash collateral at the Fund Custodian; and
  • The enforcement order noted that, “The cash collateral could have, for example, been maintained with the [Fund Custodian] subject to a tripartite agreement, that is, a three-way agreement between the [Fund Custodian], the counterparty, and the [fund].  These agreements are standard industry practice.“

As a reminder, not all derivatives require the use of a tri-party control agreement.  For example, Rule 17f-6 affords some relief for margin on qualifying exchange-traded futures contracts.  And, as described in our January 5th posting, SEC Extends No-Action Relief for Cleared Swaps for Another Year, the Rule 17f-6 relief has also been applied to collateral posted in respect of qualifying cleared swaps.

Finally, this particular enforcement action also involved circumstances relating to portfolio transactions, use of fund brokerage, and compliance issues related to Section 12 of the 1940 Act.  The enforcement order, which resulted in a $50,000 penalty, is available here.

Good day.  Good to keep custody in mind always. DR2

Tags: custody requirements derivatives, section 17 of the 1940 Act, swap collateral, tri-party control agreements, use of account control agreements
Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

Subscribe by email

Regular updates direct to your inbox

Derivatives & Repo Report

California Land Use & Development Law Report Corporate Trust Insider Food Litigation News Founder tip of the week Virtual Currency Report White Collar Briefly Privacy Quick Tips N.D.Pa.L. Trade Secret Tracker 1600 PTAB and Beyond Asset Management ADVocate Consumer Finance Legal Report Consumer Protection Review Cannabis Legal Highlights RSS Twitter Facebook LinkedIn youtube
Perkins Coie LLP logo
Anchorage|Austin|Beijing|Bellevue|Boise|Chicago|Dallas|Denver|Los Angeles|Madison|New York|Palo Alto|Phoenix|Portland|San Diego|San Francisco|Seattle|Shanghai|Taipei|Washington, D.C.
Privacy PolicyDisclaimerContact

About the Firm

Perkins Coie is a leading international law firm that is known for providing high value, strategic solutions and extraordinary client service on matters vital to our clients’ success. With more than 1,200 lawyers in offices across the United States and Asia, we provide a full array of corporate, commercial litigation, intellectual property and regulatory legal advice to a broad range of clients, including many of the world’s most innovative companies and industry leaders as well as public and not-for-profit organizations.

Topics

Archives

Copyright ©2023, Perkins Coie LLP All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo